History: The Great Trigonometrical Survey

Tim Middleton explores how India was mapped and the world’s tallest mountain named

George Everest, who painstakingly mapped much of the Indian subcontinent

It was july 1819 and the monsoon was due. Lieutenant George Everest was in the middle of the Indian jungle between the Godavari and Kristna rivers with a team of 150 men. These jungles were home to numerous menacing creatures: hump-backed boars and tigers patrolled the forest floor; boa constrictors and bird-sized spiders lived in the trees; and hornbills ruled the air.

Then the monsoon struck. Vegetation sprouted from every crevice in the cracked earth and paths soon became choked with plants. Insects swarmed everywhere. Dry riverbeds became raging torrents.

Suddenly, Everest found himself cut off from his supplies by the river Musi, a tributary of the Kristna. His next goal, the hill of Sarangapalle, was the other side of the Kristna itself. Everest’s elephants, carriers of his prized surveying instruments, refused to cross the swollen river. So Everest and 12 of his trusty men took to the water in a coracle, a small round boat woven from palms and covered in animal hides, which he had found on the river bank. Evening was drawing in, but they pressed on to Sarangapalle, a further 12 miles. By the time they reached the hills the heavens had opened. They spent the night in a raging thunderstorm with no food or tents, their Harris tweeds doing little to keep out the rain. Within a few weeks, the whole of Everest’s party had succumbed to fever. Such was the life of a surveyor in India.

George Everest had taken leadership of The Great Trigonometrical Survey in 1823 upon the death of his successor, Colonel William Lambton, who established it in 1802. It was one of a number of surveys that were set up as part of the colonial enterprise; a way for the British to stamp their authority on Indian territories. It was essential for the British rulers “to have a complete geographical knowledge of the country for their revenue and administrative purposes”. The job of this survey was, quite simply, to determine where places were. Up until this time the only known method for locating a point on the Earth’s surface was to make astronomical observations, which took months if not years to complete. Lambton recognised that surveying by triangulation was the only sensible way to make a map of India.

Triangulation involves measuring angles. If the distance between two locations is known and the angle from each of these locations to a third location is measured, then the rest of the distances and angles in the triangle can be calculated using trigonometry. Therefore, the job of a surveyor was to measure the distance along a baseline between two initial locations as accurately as possible and then to keep measuring angles and performing calculations in order to construct a whole network of triangles. However, because of the Earth’s curvature these triangles are actually being measured on the surface of a sphere. In spherical geometry, the angles in a triangle add up to slightly more than 180 degrees. This ‘spherical excess’ had to be taken into account. To make matters worse, the Earth is slightly fatter round the equator than round the poles so it isn’t actually a perfect sphere in the first place. Surveyors had, in other words, to be exceedingly confident in their mathematical ability.

Measuring the width of a river by triangulation

The angles were measured using an instrument called a theodolite, which was essentially a fancy telescope. The telescope was mounted so that it could rotate in both horizontal and vertical planes. Microscopes were mounted on the instrument for reading off the angle in each of these planes. For measuring distances, surveyors used a carefully calibrated chain, which was painstakingly manoeuvred along a baseline in order to measure its entire length. The surveyors were so meticulous that they even carried out experiments to check how the length of their chains varied with temperature. One such experiment concluded that a temperature change of 1degree made a difference of 7/1000s of an inch over the length of a 100 foot chain.

After his ordeal in the Indian jungle, Everest was plagued by fever for the next few years and was forced to return to England in 1825. But Everest used his time in England wisely, spending five years improving his instruments. He liaised with Troughton & Simms instrument makers in London to devise a new, smaller, lighter and cheaper theodolite. He also decided to make use of compensation bars, a pair of iron and brass bars strapped together, for measuring his distances. Since the two metals expand to different extents when heated, the effect of temperature on the length of the bars is compensated for. He also adopted a new surveying strategy. He realised that he didn’t need to cover the whole country with triangles but could instead create a gridiron pattern: an array of north-south and east-west traverses across the country that intersected at right angles.

Finally, in 1830 Everest returned to India. He started by triangulating from Dehra Dun to Sironj, a distance of 400 miles across the plains of northern India. The land was so flat that Everest had to design and construct 50 foot high masonry towers on which to mount his theodolites. Sometimes the air was too hazy to make measurements during the day so Everest had the idea of using powerful lanterns, which were visible from 30 miles away, for surveying by night. With all this new equipment, Everest’s party was now 700 men strong. The entourage included four elephants for the principals to ride on, thirty horses for the military officers and forty-two camels for carrying supplies.

North Face of Mount Everest as seen from the path to base camp

By the time Everest retired from the survey in 1843 most of the job was done. The survey’s line of triangles up the spine of India covered an area of 56,997 square miles, from Cape Comorin in the south to the Himalayas in the north. What is utterly remarkable is the accuracy they achieved. From time to time, they would measure the length of a baseline at the far end of a line of triangles to check their results. One such measurement of a 7.19 mile baseline differed only 3.7 inches from the value calculated by triangulation.

People are unsure whether Everest ever laid eyes on the mountain that bears his name. It was his successor, Andrew Waugh, who extended the triangulation network into the Himalayas and named the mountain after him. Waugh wanted “to perpetuate the memory of that illustrious master of geographical research…Everest.” Unfortunately, Waugh wasn’t aware of the local Tibetan name of Chomolungma; perhaps another mark of the nature of British colonialism. But it is nevertheless fitting that the tallest mountain in the world is at least in part named after one of the giants of surveying.

Today, the Ordnance Survey in the UK employs a combination of aerial photographs and GPS (global positioning satellites) for their map making, meaning it can largely be done at a desk. However, the dedication of 19th century surveyors such as Everest in the face of so many adversities is commendable. Indeed, The Great Trigonometrical Survey of India has, quite appropriately, been described as “one of the most stupendous works in the whole history of science.”

Tim Middleton is a 3rd year undergraduate in the Department of Earth Sciences

  • May Irene

    I’m a 77 year old fairly well read American who must have been absent from school on the day this was discussed.  Simon Winchester referred to the Triangulation of India and I was clueless.  Thanks for the delightful and well explained history.  You will go far, my lad.  If you are you female,  “Hooray!”

  • Mac

    Very good work, do you have a bibliography?

  • Danhoman

    Dear Mathaiah,

         Please forgive me for not replying sooner.  I’m in my late sixties and adjusting slowly to the 21st century!  :)

         I’m interested in your comment.  As I grow in my faith in my savior and Lord Jesus, I’ve found a desire to try to do what I can to understand and maybe even make up for, at least in some small way, prior wrongs – whether I can be linked to them directly or not.

         Can you give me any details about what makes you feel this way?  I know that some reasons may be pretty obvious to those who are affected most by them, but from what I’ve seen, the relationship between the British and India does seem to have some significant symbiotic-ness to it, but I could be wrong.

         Thanks again …        .  .  .        Dan Homan

  • Danhoman

    Hi Mac,

         I don’t know if this question is for me or not, but I got it in an e-mail today (of which I was greatly suspicious!)

         Anyway, I have no bibliography.  I did have one book I found on bookfinders.com, but I gave it to my father.  I’ll try to remember to check the title and author the next time I see him.  I believe the author’s name was something like “Markham”.  It’s a reprint of a book from the late nineteenth century titled something like “The Surveys of India”.  I first found it, in its original form, at the library of Temple University in Philadelphia, PA.  I kept looking for a copy of it, and then somewhat miraculously found one on bookfinder.  The best book I found, though (also at Temple’s library), was for use in British secondary schools.  It was MUCH more recent and in like-new condition.  I don’t remember the name, and I’ve never seen it again – even searching for it several times in the Temple library.

  • Roland

    There is a superb documentary on the Metre adventure in France. Is there one on the mapping of India or the work of Everest?
     

  • Danhoman

    The only documentary on the survey of which I am aware is the one I mentioned in my first post:  “K-2: Taller than Everest?”  …by the way – an interesting fact – His name is pronounced “EVE-rest”, and I’ve heard that he’d have been quite displeased that we’ve been mispronouncing it!  :)

  • Brian

    The person who found the tallest mountain on the Earth is one of the greatest Indian surveyor Radhanath Shikhdhar. The vile english historians never gave due credit to this Indian who deserved the credit worth every inch of the mountain’s height. It is very sad that instead Everest and Waugh get all the credits without having anything to do with the actual exploration to find the height of the tallest mountain.

  • Danhoman

    Any documentation on Radhanath Shikhdhar?  I’m not sure your adjective of “vile” is called for, even if it has been unduly credited to Everest and Waugh.  If it is true, is there any evidence that it was purposeful?

  • Ash_kripton

    first person who measure hight of mount everest is radhanath shikhdhar. He measure hight as 29000. the local name of mount averest (these name were already exist when britis gave name to this everest) are Chomolungma, Devdhung, Sagarmatha. actully at that time british surveyer were not alowed to go to nepal or tibet. so some local surveyor help to do this work & their names are Kishanshinh (A.K.), Nenshinh (No. 1), Manishinh (G.M.), Sukhdarshanshinh (G.S.S), Lama serap gyatso, Mirza suja (The Mirza), Lala hedar shah (The Havildar), Nemshinh(G.M.N), Atta muhammad(The Mullah), Kithupshinh(K.P.), Kalyanshinh(G.K.), Rinzin namgyal(R.N.), Hariram(No. 9), Lama ugyen gyatso(U.G.), Attaram, Saratchandra das(S.C.D.), Mukhtar shah(M.S.), Alag abdul subhan(A.S.), Abdul hamid. the charachters in bracket was their code name.

  • Dan Homan

         Yes, I’m familiar with the problems travelling to Nepal at that time.  I read about it in Markham’s book and others, but having loaned out that book and not getting it back and not remembering if these names are in his book.  I’m not saying you’re wrong.  God knows how often we overlook giving credit where credit is due, and sometimes even purposefully and in greed for recognition or more, but I would like to know of other documentation that may help confirm this for me; in other words, is there somewhere other than in you post where I can see this information?
         Thanks for following through on this!  :)

  • Rajiv

    It would be churlish to deny the role of Lambton-Everest who initiated
    and led the Great Trigonometric Survey, nurturing such Indian scientists
    as they could gather around them, including Shikdhar. Actually if this was to play out today in India, given the societal and political class’s respect for merit, Shikdhar may have never fulfilled his potential
    with or without Everest!

  • Danhoman

         I believe we can disagree and search for the truth, if so inclined, without using adjectives such as “vile” and “churlish”  I’d like to think that we can better engage in this without he use of such unnecessary words.

  • http://asiatour.info/?p=149 The Greatest Moments on Everest: 10. The Mountain Is Discovered · Asia Travel Guide

    […] the 1850s, as the Trigonometric Survey of India, arguably the greatest feat of scientific inquiry in human history, pushed north into the […]